email hello@mobbu.com or call Alex Laurie on +44 (0)797 643 6630
Recently Posted
Recent Comments
Links in brief
TXP.icio.us requires MagpieRSS
The 20 October 2010 spending review announced cuts to the Home Office budget of 23% (6% annually) by 2015.
Home Secretary Theresa May’s comment: “I believe that by improving efficiency, driving out waste, and increasing productivity we can maintain a strong police service, a secure border and effective counter terrorism capabilities whilst delivering significant savings.”
The numbers:
Reductions will be achieved by:
Olympic spending and counter-terrorism funding are semi-protected:
Note that because 80%+ of police budgets are headcount, it’s hard to achieve cuts without reducing staff and frontline numbers. Osborne said that the aim was to maintain “visibility and availability” of officers on beat, but equally no guarantee on police numbers was offered.
Indeed, HMIC’s July 2010 report had warned that efficiency gains would take policing only so far: “A cut beyond 12% would almost certainly reduce police availability unless it were prioritised over and above everything else the police did” (Valuing the Police, July 2010, p4) and Greater Manchester Police’s Chief Constable Peter Fahy’s said there was “no question” the cuts would lead to fewer officers. KPMG predicts 18,000 police officers jobs will go, and the Police Federation 20,000.
There will certainly be significant budget pressure on IT, infrastructure and other service projects. I’ll follow up on this soon with something on “doing more with less”.
See also: MoD spending plan 2010-2015
UK military spending plan 2010-2020 Reducing costs in policing